Creating Organizational Cultures That Prevent Workplace Harassment


Workplace harassment refers to offensive or prejudiced actions whereby an individual is periodically oppressed professionally, inflicting labor or emotional complications. People undergoing workroom nuisances are impacted in their confidence, raise their insecurity, and sometimes get into aggravated circumstances. These circumstances have a high probability of causing alteration or depression among affected staff (Bambi et al., 2017). Although both genders can be impacted by workplace harassment, studies indicate that women are the most affected victims of the social battle. The female gender cannot be a defendant of harassment instigated by colleagues or employers via their place to manipulate personnel.

Workplace pestering is unwelcome activities grounded on an individual’s race, tint, conviction, gender, nation of derivation, ethnicity, age, or infirmity. The goals of the nuisance are individuals who are typically professed as “feebler” or “mediocre” by the soul who is distressing them. Corporations and bosses can likewise be remorseful of workplace aggravation if they use discriminatory performs against persons founded on background, origin, country, faith, color, race, age, sex, or incapacity. These prejudiced observes been prohibited and modified to be extra inclusive of additional publics who experience judgment.

Harassment involves various behaviors such as threats, derogatory statements, intimidation, malicious words, or other unwelcome, inappropriate, verbal, or physical advances that substitute hostile work surroundings for an individual on the acquiring conclusion of harassing actions or words. Workplace harassment also includes any verbal or actions that inflict psychological or physical ferocity on others (Poling et al., 2019). It aims at causing or controlling serious bodily injuries, death, or property damages. Additionally, Workplace violence comprises abusive behavior toward authority, threatening or harassing conduct, and threats.

The Challenge: The Rise of Male-Female Sexual Harassment

Workplace sexual harassment has been an enormous problem facing several businesses in the current era. It can occur to anybody and can transpire anywhere, whether at the workplace or elsewhere, and disturb all kinds of gender, race, and age. Sexual aggravation has become a question in workplaces due to many cases (Zhu et al., 2019). Ordinary media devour casing sexual harassment due to prominent cases; it has become a subject on numerous TV demonstrations and main morning radio conversation displays mostly daily. Sexual harassment rules must be supported to solve a solemn delinquent nowadays in workplaces. Numerous sexual harassment occurrences are under-informed in some occurrences because other fatalities are endangered. Victims are moreover frightened to come onward.

In school environments, students are pushed to favor their teachers in contradiction of their resolve to exaggerate their marks. Female employees are requested to do nepotism to advance their careers. Discriminatory performances are frequently caused by males in influential positions, also recognized as voluptuous harassment (Bondestam & Lundqvist, 2020). High-profile males at times use their position to lure females into sexual activities. Work harassment cases are associated with various risks whereby the nature of the occupation and specifically workplace gender ratio and conventionally male-oriented positions are among important factors. Factory gender ratio and the nature of the job pose increased risks for the females to face circumstances of being harassed or offended sexually. The organization’s culture and social norms are important aspects that determine whether women or other workers will be harassed while at work.

Workplace harassment is divided into written/verbal, visual, and physical harassment. Written/verbal harassment is the most common workplace prejudice that most workers experience daily. Verbal harassment can occur in various instances, including when employers convey emails with aggressive jokes or visuals concerning race or conviction or when they request sexual favoritisms in individuals or over text (Poling et al., 2019). Enquiring about family antiquity of genetic disorders or illness, making pejorative comments about somebody’s disability or stage of development, and copying someone’s extraneous pronunciation behind their posterior are also among verbal harassment workers experience. Tactlessly, even the shrillest HR specialists sometimes slip the numerous signs and categories of workplace annoyance. Therefore, it is nearly impossible to retain observations of overall workers’ activities.

Workforces have personal ideas concerning what it implies to act workwise in the office. Workplace harassment creates an antagonistic work setting and stimulates HR experts to place themselves in the position of all personnel and recognize every deed. The main thing to observe in workplaces and employee well-being is expertise (Jha & Varkkey, 2018). For instance, if one worker forwards an electronic mail with pornographic images, it can mingle to the extent where everybody in the workplace gets it even if the sender did not intend to circulate the images. Physical irritation may be slightly harder to identify since it can occasionally be understated. Physical harassment includes lewd hand signals or other gesticulations meant to carry curse words, the unwelcome stirring of a being or their dress, and regularly ensuing or standing near an individual on the determination.

Making sexually evocative facial language and playing the melody with offensive or humiliating language is likewise among the physical harassment examples. For instance, if two associates are joking and one style an unsuitable hand sign and somebody else gets it, they may feel scratchy and distraught. Visual harassment is perhaps the firmest to spot because it is the greatest independence and needs workers to put themselves in another person’s shoes (Smith & Coel, 2018). Visual harassment instances include dress codes that depict offensive language, showing sexual nature posters, displaying sexually suggestive messages, watching violent tapes, and drawing fierce or pejorative images. For example, somebody might display a comic strip in their workspace, and while various people may find the pun funny, others may regard it as violent and threatening.

Implications for Organizations

Harassment is an employment discrimination element that disturbs several central and state rules. Sexual pestering is persistent, unsolicited sexual advances, spoken abuse, and anxieties for sexual string-pulling. Behavior gets illegal when long-lasting annoyance is in a state of continued engagement and generates an antagonistic or threatening setting. If a company has more workforces, harassment being a problem, gets high (Rai & Agarwal, 2018). However, women find it hard to report the harassments they experience at work to the responsible authority due to the fear of losing their positions or being fired. When women are sexually harassed at work, they find the environment complex to attain their goals.

Workplace harassment has several implications for organizations, including physical and emotional challenges, financial and professional issues, low organizational performance, poor organizational commitment, absenteeism, and low employee turnover (Lever et al., 2019). Victims of erotic harassment often agonize emotional and mental harm, as well as stress, despair, and nervousness. They repeatedly experience decreased self-confidence and self-worth. Physical health difficulties may arise, including loss of nap and appetite, mass fluctuations, nausea, and headaches. Sexual nuisance can also destroy a target’s job presentation and career path. Fear and reduced confidence can make different people quit the workroom and untie co-workers. Harassed employees are highly likely to be delinquent, absentminded, unfocussed, and neglected.

Workplace harassment causes absence, low morale, hatred, gossip, anxiety, and stress. Low output is more communal in surroundings with high sexual harassment rates. Victims and observers of sensual persecutions are expected to quit, contributing to high worker turnover and associated hiring and exercise cost upsurges (Maguire et al., 2018). A toxic setting will likewise make employing top talent extra difficult. Lethal workplaces attract reduced employee efficiency. When a wage earner is knowledgeable on the occurrence of sexual aggravation, or inferior a steady movement of pain, their yield will be pretentious. In addition, workplace harassment leads to job displeasure and disengagement (Zhu et al., 2019). Consequently, harassment distracts employees, making them neglect their duties, causing a low performance of the organization’s processes.

Organizational molestation declines the motivation of workers and their capacity to focus on the duties they are assigned due to sexual ambiguities. Sexual harassment trauma leaves lasting impacts on the well-being of workers. Women who experience sexual abuse have high chances of developing depression, which tampers how they engage in their duties (Zhu et al., 2019). Furthermore, they experience incapacitating stress responses, sleep illnesses, high plasma pressure, dropped self-worth, and biliousness. Employees who perceive hassle in the workplace experience low psychological and human happiness, which impact their physical and mental health due to the hostile work environment and harassment fears. Organizations where workers often face vexing experience a poor reputation of their brand losing potential clients, impacting their profits and performance.

Customers who observe or are conscious of “incivility” focused on a worker within the office develop undesirable simplifications, making them less prospective to buy from the company. Workers who have encountered an “unfair” enterprise will energetically discourage possible customers from obtaining goods or facilities from their proprietor. Sexual provocation experienced by females impacts employee retention and hiring in an organization since employees have minimal chances of staying in toxic environments (Zhu et al., 2019). Another characteristic of how intimidation affects the organization is substituting the staff members who have left, which is challenging. Unfair treatments discourage other workers from working in a similar organization due to the fear of being treated unfairly or pressured for sexual favors. A corporation’s failure to sufficiently stop and handle sexual persecution can result in expensive proceedings.

What Can Be Done

Organizations can adopt various strategies to ensure minimal workplace harassment, particularly sexual harassment. Some tactics businesses can implement include; notifying employees and other workers that the company prioritizes sexual prevention and educating both the management and employees on what sexual harassment is (Rai & Agarwal, 2018). Telling laborers and the administration the activities they should avoid that encourage harassment, offering positive training to workers about sexual harassment, and enlightening employees about the act are also important strategies firms should consider. Companies can also ensure the workplace is harassment-free, listen to employee complaints, and take strict actions on those involved in distressing workers. The action will help industries reduce the sexual harassment cases in workplaces in the recent era.

Businesses can increase the consciousness of the urge to be more active in educating and informing staff on behaviors that are not tolerable in the workplace. They can assess their harassment strategies regularly and converse about the rules and the values they frequently replicate not just throughout onboarding or yearly working out sequences but all over the year. Employments can contain strong, clear statements that stopping harassment is a company’s priority to help avert victimization at work (Smith & Coel, 2018). Any member who opposes the policy will be held answerable, irrespective of their career in the corporation. An establishment’s HR and top executives should formulate strategies that prevent offenses since employees and managers will take them more seriously.

Employers can take various measures to ensure staff members comprehend the categories of behaviors and actions that are unsuitable. Equally vital is educating managers, executives, and personnel about the delicate harassment forms. Harassment is not only about untimely physical contact; it includes various offensive and undesirable deeds and activities, counting unfitting sexual commentaries, exhibiting or watching unfortunate content, etc. These lower-stake remarks or manners harm working relations and team philosophy and may intensify more badgering if left unrestrained (Lever et al., 2019). Teams do not retort well to suggestions or absolute statements why they are undertaking something incorrectly, that they cannot be reliable, or are rumored to be remorseful of appealing in wicked behaviors.

Most employee training focuses on the wrong activities they engage in rather than focusing on the positive methods. Organizations can include positive approaches when training employees to create a desirable surrounding for work. Using constructive messaging that accepts workforces are interested in doing the accurate thing involves them in sexual harassment deterrence solutions (Bambi et al., 2017). The action also inspires workers to promote a respectful ethos that can be more actual in shaping worker deportment than a “stick” method that emphasizes bad deeds and significances to be evaded. Additionally, a strong concentration on the rules and regulations connected to sexual irritation can quickly restrain staff.

Organizations can establish rules and guidelines the management and workers should observe to eliminate harassment for amenability reasons. The guidelines do not have to oblige as the solitary foundation of a corporation’s harrying prevention exercise and communication exertions. Most workers are not employment law specialists; consuming lawful verbal contrary to satisfactory workplace behavior is unhurried. Case rule fact outlines day-to-day guide actions that can initiate behavior values to the lowermost mutual denominator (Bambi et al., 2017). The policy can gesture that when words or schedules are not unlawful, they are tolerable. In contrast, focusing on professional, respectful behavior engages and influences employees and directors rather than identifying permissible violations.

HR leaders, executives, and superintendents cannot be nursing harassment every time. Nonetheless, by recruiting the assistance of lineups themselves, corporations can increase the probabilities that episodes or warning harassment signs will be realized, reported and replaced upon, and prevented. HR is not in charge of averting work sexual harassment, but employees are. Companies can train employees as good witnesses to fund an optimistic and dutiful workplace culture by interposing harassment and its cautionary signs (Bondestam & Lundqvist, 2020). Supporting other staff who have witnessed harm, formally broadcasting harassment, and heartening others’ friendship also enable workforces to fund an organizational culture that discourages intimidation.

Organizations can include employees in eliminating workplace exacerbation and offering them adequate resources and training to assist them in taking action when harassed. The strategy is an important step that can play a significant role in leveraging the masses’ powers to generate safety and veneration culture (Bambi et al., 2017). Not all personnel will feel contented personally walking into verbose a condition. There are additional steps establishments could take, still, including interjecting or sidetracking the individual acting inaptly or spreading the matter to the management or HR. If staff feel the company will do nothing if harassment subjects arise, they will break reporting these occurrences. The employees or employers committing the destruction may feel encouraged to continue.

Firms respond punctually to harassment reports, are involved in a detailed and detached review/examination of the situation, impose evocative consequences appropriately, and let workers know that the company has taken action. While administrations often fail to share specific and individual information regarding disciplinary activities reserved, they can normally connect about these movements and the industry’s absolute pledge to holding individuals responsible for occurrences of sexual pressures. If organizations put these preventative policies to work, they can eliminate harassment and build a supportive and respective organizational culture.

Evaluation of the Recommendation

Sexual harassment at the workplace has devastating impacts on the workers included in the workplace surroundings the harassments occur. Despite how fast a company might retort to a voluptuous harassment grievance, the act could have caused severe damages to the victim. It is vitally significant that an organization follows the effective strategies and actions highlighted above to discourse sexual harassment cases. Still, even more imperative than having swift ways of replying to sexual harassment complaints, having a culture and system that averts the occurrence of the harassment is more significant (Smith & Coel, 2018). Therefore, the recommendations will ensure harassment is not practiced in the workplace, and all workers feel harmless while working and are pickled with self-respect and esteem.

The organization will enjoy good relationships between clients and employees or workers and their employers or management. Employees will easily believe their employers when an organization is harassment-free since workers prefer using internal channels when addressing their complaints. In addition, employees would effortlessly address the employer directly rather than filing complaints with authorities such as lawyers. Low costs are incurred when complaints are handled internally than following legal routes that involve litigation costs, resources preoccupied for managing the claim, and time consumed speaking the grievance.

The organization will benefit because eliminating harassment will enable the organization also to eradicate human and expressive trials, monetary and proficient subjects, low performance, poor commitment, nonattendance, and employee turnover. As the workforce feels protected, they get more motivated to report to work, improving their performance by increasing productivity. Employee turnover rate is likewise inferior for such industries enabling the organizations to enjoy high market status (Bambi et al., 2017). Conversely, the organization will have a better customer satisfaction rating than its contestants. Employee loyalty, assistance among workforces, and sophisticated engagement are the three benefits the business will enjoy.


Eliminating workplace harassment by offering adequate training to employees and the management ensures organizations uphold their values and follow personal morals and business ethics. Not only that but also taking strict steps for the workers or employers who engage in harassment will ensure an organization complies with the laws that address sexual harassment and avoids financial and legal liabilities and negative publicity caused by harassment claims. Employees’ attention on their career is developed when an organization is harassment-free than in businesses with harassment matters. Besides, cooperation among workers is healthier in a tuneful work atmosphere.


Bambi, S., Guazzini, A., De Felippis, C., Lucchini, A., & Rasero, L. (2017). Preventing workplace incivility, lateral violence and bullying between nurses. A narrative literature review. Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis, 88(Suppl 5), 39. Web.

Bondestam, F., & Lundqvist, M. (2020). Sexual harassment in higher education–a systematic review. European Journal of Higher Education, 10(4), 397-419. Web.

Jha, J. K., & Varkkey, B. (2018). Are you a cistern or a channel? Exploring factors triggering knowledge-hiding behavior at the workplace: Evidence from the Indian R&D professionals. Journal of Knowledge Management. Web.

Lever, I., Dyball, D., Greenberg, N., & Stevelink, S. A. (2019). Health consequences of bullying in the healthcare workplace: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(12), 3195-3209. Web.

Maguire, B. J., O’Meara, P., O’Neill, B. J., & Brightwell, R. (2018). Violence against emergency medical services personnel: A systematic review of the literature. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 61(2), 167-180. Web.

Poling, D. V., Smith, S. W., Taylor, G. G., & Worth, M. R. (2019). Direct verbal aggression in school settings: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 46, 127-139. Web.

Rai, A., & Agarwal, U. A. (2018). A review of literature on mediators and moderators of workplace bullying: Agenda for future research. Management Research Review. Web.

Smith, F. L., & Coel, C. R. (2018). Workplace bullying policies, higher education and the First Amendment: Building bridges not walls. First Amendment Studies, 52(1-2), 96-111. Web.

Zhu, H., Lyu, Y., & Ye, Y. (2019). Workplace sexual harassment, workplace deviance, and family undermining. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. Web.

Find out your order's cost