There is a great difference between leadership and management, they are distinctively separate things. For instance, management involves planning, coordinating, and organizing. On the other hand, leadership involves inspiring and motivating.
While managers depend entirely on offered guidelines in carrying out their management roles, leaders on the other hand come up with their own ideas. Unlike managers, leaders are born with leadership potentials. Leaders portray their development abilities through their creativity. Managers do not undergo any development; they copy what other managers do in their organizations. Lack of originality makes managers maintain what they found running in their organizations.
Managers pay attention to developing systems and structures. They aim at advancing technologically by emphasizing the observance of new formats of buildings and physical features. On the contrary, leaders show great interest in people. They prefer human interests to physical things such as buildings. Managers and leaders run also their activities differently.
For example, managers aim at controlling a small group of persons in a given organization. They achieve this by putting in practice all available governing measures. Besides, leaders work towards ensuring that their subjects develop trust in them. With the coexistence of trust, many leaders manage to convince the public into voting them into power. Compared to leaders, managers have a short field of view. In addition to managers thinking within their working environment, they also avoid incorporating other individuals’ ideas in carrying out their responsibilities. On the other hand, leaders think widely in their daily activities, they incorporate other individuals’ ideas in carrying out leadership roles.
Managers and leaders utilize their efforts differently.
Managers of given organizations divert most of their energy in wanting to know how to carry out responsibilities. Managers also like knowing the day or time of occurrence of certain activities in the provided guidelines. On the contrary, leaders occasionally find out reasons for the occurrence of certain activities. In addition, leaders explain easily why they might have been involved in certain activities. For instance, most leaders manage to convince the public of reasons why they might have been involved in scandals. Thus, leaders have the ability to defend themselves without relying on the support of other people or documents. Managers are answerable to everything that occurs within organizations, thus, they keep track of everything that takes place within their organizations. On the other side, leaders are concerned with the outcome of things. They pay attention to issues that contribute to the achievement of their goals.
Leaders and managers also carry out their daily activities differently. For instance, managers mimic what other organizations do, they incorporate into their organizations what they see happening in other organizations. On the contrary, leaders come up with their own styles of working. Additionally, while managers work without questioning on unclear events happening within their organizations, leaders on the other hand pay more attention to issues that need clarification and questions where necessary.
Managers act like soldiers. They keep a trail on all activities that run within organizations. To avoid conflicts, managers ensure that they have done everything right. On the other contrary, leaders control themselves. They are answerable to their own deeds; thus, they engage in doing the right things.
In conclusion, there is a great relation between managers and leaders. They both control a given group of individuals in running their daily activities. However, they are diverse differences between managers and leaders. While the majority of the managers depend on the provided outlines in running their daily activities, leaders on the other hand come up with ideas that they implement in their leadership roles.