Euthanasia is an issue in medicine that poses imminent controversies cause of the dynamic ethical overview. The practice enshrines physician-assisted suicide among individuals to solve the ideological terminal illness condition. According to Callahan, it is offensive to implement the policy since it reflects allowance on conditional murder (52). The researcher further indicates that the justification of the euthanasia concept encompasses four main categories. The phases enshrine moral aspects concerning individualism, irrelevance regarding killing and the allowance on death, the paucity of harmful experiences on legalizing euthanasia, and the compatibility of the practice with medical professionalism. I agree with Callahan that quietus should not be legalized since it threatens the ideological approach across the virtual spectrum.
Euthanasia is a concept that involves the assisted death of a patient and usually encounters profound controversies. According to Dierickx et al. a significant percentage of sick people under palliative care chose euthanasia, explaining that their decision was satisfactory (114). Dierickx et al. further depict that patients without hospice enlightenment sought alternatives from euthanasia cause of the lack of disclosure. Therefore, physician-assisted suicide is an essential factor in determining euthanasia among patients. In a different spectrum, Dierickx et al. provide an integrated approach towards enhancing the role of family and relatives. Although palliative care influenced the decision-making about euthanasia, the family and relatives played a vital role by influencing the patient’s autonomy. The results showed that a higher number of patients under palliative care who made the euthanasia decision were admitted to hospitals while others received home-based care. In this case, the client’s autonomy in deciding about euthanasia relies on palliative care and contribution from families and relatives.
There is a significant interdependence between euthanasia and ethical practice. In this case, the physician geared the end-of-life care for patients. However, the policy’s change to patient autonomy as a right rendered the one-sided view of euthanasia an option or a singular solution to the patient’s health problem. Kouwenhoven et al. stipulate that the essence of the term “autonomy” among patients plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of euthanasia (44). Therefore, the context enhances the derivation of important information about the impact of an ill person’s decision. In the US, the healthcare policy changed the regulatory framework to establish that the decision depends on the patient’s choice. According to Kouwenhoven et al. the change of liberty from an ideal to the concept of a right negatively affected the doctor’s ability to deliver the services. Initially, the physician operated based on autonomy as an ideal, hence choosing the best alternative for the sick individual.
The independence aspect from the patient is an essential element when practicing euthanasia. Pesapane et al. stipulate that the essence of the term “autonomy” among patients plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of euthanasia (2). Therefore, the context enhances the derivation of important information about the impact of an ill person’s decision. In US, the healthcare policy changed the regulatory framework to establish that the decision depends on the patient’s choice. According to the researchers, the change of liberty from an ideal to the concept of a right negatively affected the physician’s ability to deliver the services (Pesapane et al. 3). Primarily, the physician operated based on autonomy as an ideal, hence choosing the best alternative for the sick individual. In this case, the physician geared the end-of-life care for patients. However, the policy’s change to patient autonomy as a right rendered the one-sided view of euthanasia an option or the singular solution to the patient’s health problem.
The interdependence between nursing practice and euthanasia’s ethical issues highly affects the continuum of care. In this case, the researchers focus on the interpretation of mercy killing by nurses and its significance to patient treatment (Pesut et al. 153). On the one hand, assisted death provides a solution to the pain and agony of an ill person. On the other hand, nurses lack clarity based on effectiveness and relevance despite a sick person’s autonomy being a right in various countries. According to the researchers, the change of independence from an ideal to the concept of a right negatively affected the physician’s ability to deliver the services (Pesut et al. 154). Initially, the medical practitioner operated based on self-reliance as an ideal solution, hence choosing the best alternative for the patient. This article provides an insight into the operability of an individual’s sovereignty and the nurses’ justification. Therefore, it is paramount that researchers further explore the rationale for autonomy and the essence of the care policy to protect life.
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) was once absent for admittance purposes due to the institutional policies and practices. CMS is recognized as the primary executive payer concerned with existing social insurance in the United States of America (Leonard et al., 2017). Medicaid is a mainframe that profoundly influences the trickle-down health benefits to U.S citizens. However, the above active projects are substantially regulated by the CMS. The agency ensures practical medical services applications by focusing on critical human services costs that influence sustainability. Essentially, the CMS must address monetary challenges, which improves the essential eradication of ineffective health assistance to the patients. Thus, to address low health help, there is a need to provide payment services to medicinal suppliers. The critical social determinants of health encompass safe and affordable housing, availability of healthy foods, public safety, social support system, and socioeconomic conditions.
Health policy analysis addresses major problems of CMS contribution and the dynamic challenges posed by population demographics. The aging nurses encounter a fundamental challenge from the health policy since it falls short of such expectations as addressing the disability retirement conditions and approaches to prevent the outcome. Efficiency in the healthcare department depends on the regulations, outreach, and programs as the circumstances to the critical legal issue (Teitelbaum & Wilensky, 2020). There is a controversial work requirement to enhance the significant impact of the Medicaid stamp.
There is a plan of shifting the present Medicaid funding specifically to a block grant exemplary. One of the main issues in the financial management of Medicaid resources involves the budgeting limits on direct safety-net health programs, especially for the dynamic population. Effective healthcare management involves all stakeholders, such as CMS and the federal government, in the decision-making process to improve the sustainable growth in the effectiveness of Medicaid.
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is more concerned with the act of administering the world’s major health programs. Another role for CMS is the management of the insurance policies for U.S citizens. The organization is also concerned with collecting and analyzing data and producing various research reports. CMS is greatly concerned with managing the Administrative Simplification Standards associated with the Health Insurance Profitability and Accountability Act (HIPPA). The Administrative Simplification Standards’ primary usage is the critical implementation of the adoption, which conducts related to the national electronic health care records, enforcing the HIPPA rules, and guaranteeing patients’ security and privacy. The integral participation of all stakeholders in the implementation process of the policy is a sustainable approach that boosts efficiency in service delivery (Wilensky and Joel 3). An interplay of both institutions’ roles fosters a sustainable improvement in the healthcare sector decision-making process with a profound support system from the technological tools.
Stakeholders such as the government, U.S citizens, non-governmental organizations, healthcare practitioners, and foreign companies contribute to society’s health landscape. The role of the partners involves mainly addressing the issue of quality assurance and management (Leonard et al. 2). Wilensky and Joel further establish that the critical participants in policy implementation, such as the Governor’s office, patients, advocacy community, and the senior Medicaid and agency leadership, influence medical care (2). The primary issue that impacts the quality and efficiency of Medicaid policies is technology in service delivery. Pesapane et al. establish that artificial intelligence upgrades healthcare services quality due to cost-effectiveness and required resources for delivery (2). The primary regulatory instruments contributing to effective healthcare services are the decision-making process and service delivery tools, mainly artificial intelligence. Apart from the devices and policies, McDowell and South establish that spiritual well-being in medical operations is a strategy that promotes effectiveness in the patients’ treatment (127). It is crucial that nurses focus on enhancing the quality of services under the stipulations of the code of ethics.
There is a significant interdependent relationship between physicians’ roles and the essence of euthanasia. The researchers further demonstrate the controversy about patient autonomy and the relevance of euthanasia as a patient care mechanism (Miller et al. 84). In the recent past, a patient approached a doctor and requested that in the case her Alzheimer’s health condition worsens, she gets euthanized. The physician followed her request and carried out the assisted death. However, the Dutch Euthanasia review committee established that the medical practitioner violated the due process while undertaking the practice. The information provided by Miller et al. demonstrates the legal impact of euthanasia on the physicians and the patients cause of the interpretation of the term “autonomy” (85). Euthanasia is an issue that lies in the balance of moral and ethical practice in the healthcare sector. Therefore, it is essential to assess the legal matters and the interpretation of the relationship between patients and the physician in determining the euthanasian approach.
Euthanasia poses a profound controversy concerning ethical practice within the aspect of nursing policy. In this case, the researchers focus on the interpretation of euthanasia by nurses and its significance to patient care (Pesut et al. 152). On the one hand, assisted death provides a solution to the pain and agony. On the other hand, nurses lack clarity based on its effectiveness and relevance despite patient autonomy being a right in some countries. According to the researchers, the change of autonomy from an ideal to the concept of a right negatively affected the physician’s ability to deliver the services. Initially, the doctor operated based on autonomy as an ideal, hence choosing the best alternative for the patient. Therefore, it is paramount that researchers further explore the rationale for patient autonomy and the essence of patient care implementation to protect life.
The suffering of a psychiatric patient is an issue that enhances the debate regarding the necessity of euthanasia. This article focuses on a profound approach to the health initiative for psychiatric patients suffering from intrapersonal, societal, and existential hopelessness. Therefore, euthanasia offers a patient peace by ending the pain. However, it is an aspect that faces different challenges mainly due to the essence of patient autonomy. Other countries address the euthanasia issue on various platforms. Verhofstadt et al. postulate that measuring the significance of patient autonomy is crucial, especially for psychiatric individuals (238). In most cases, a person lacks hope for a better life and resolves euthanasia as an option. Although it is the right of the patient to choose euthanasia as a solution, it is the mandate of the physician to determine the relevance to the patient’s life. Different nurses demonstrate distinct responses to the issue of euthanasia. Primarily, euthanasia is an issue in the healthcare sector that threatens the decision-making, ethical, moral practice among the medical practitioners and the influence from patients’ families.
The main outlier concerning physicians’ responsibilities and ethical practice within medicine enshrine justification of euthanasia. According to Arras, it is essential to establish the influential critical factor impacting patients’ autonomy (361). On the one hand, personalities focus on the vital aspect of killing an individual based on the subjective framework on survival ability. On the other hand, Verhofstadt et al. establish the optimal necessity of indicating the effect of induced death among personalities. Incorporating the nursing metaparadigm within the mainframe is crucial to enhancing moral and virtual entities.
There is a significant interdependent relationship between healthcare quality and leadership. It is the mandate of the management to monitor and ensure proficient implementation of policies and the use of resources. Patient care is a service-oriented phenomenon encompassing optimal exploitation of dynamic approaches to enhance experience amid all personnel (Sfantou et al. 1). This is an excellent example of a practice that relies on administration participation in implementing a metaparadigm mainframe that asserts the level of treatment and recovery among all clients. The governance system highly determines the hallmark of medication within the industry hence the importance of integrating the two major entities.
The quality of services in hospitals reflects the implementation of the dynamic medical theoretical frameworks. The metaparadigm mainframe is a multifaceted phenomenon enshrining nursing, healthcare, environment, and person integration. In this case, it is the responsibility of the practitioners to optimally consider consent amid clients to boost the recovery and treatment based on efficient interaction (Sfantou et al. 2). On the one hand, educating the patients about the procedures asserts the prominence of observing preventive measures to avoid re-admission for similar cases. On the other hand, creating awareness fosters ethical and moral codes in the industry based on the invasion of an individual’s body parts.
The interdependence between healthcare quality and leadership is a phenomenon that fosters the implementation of sufficient service experience. Nursing is one of the industries that depend on the physicians’ proficiency, hence the significance of implementing such policies as metaparadigm mainframes that empower the administration in monitoring operations across the institutions. Euthanasia is a vital controversy in medicine since it contrasts the role of practitioners but also poses an alternative to poor living quotient (Brock 10). The integration of technological advancements within the industry intensifies professionalism in the sector and the interplay between the two compositions.
The topical issue concerning euthanasia faces distinct controversies as a multidimensional phenomenon due to impact in the practice and quality of living. Research by Brock indicates that practitioners encounter a key ethical dilemma regarding physician-induced suicide among patents (11). The main reason lies in justification of dynamic entities upon the interaction amid individuals. The solution to kill a person emerges as the ultimate option over other alternatives. However, it is important to incorporate the legal clauses stipulating the level of involvement of relatives and friends. It is crucial to integrate optimal aspects to elevate the performance between doctors while intensifying the clients’ living quotient.
In conclusion, euthanasia is an essential factor that renders a prominent effect on medical practice efficiency. It is the responsibility of practitioners to establish ethical practices based on the induced death among the patients. It is crucial to indicate the interdependent variables concerning the effect of euthanasia policy. On the one hand, the approach violates the ideology that a doctor focuses on protecting an individual’s life. On the other hand, the aspect renders insight into the interaction between the virtuosity and essence of alleviating pain. Therefore, physician-assisted suicide is an essential factor in determining euthanasia among patients. In a different spectrum, the researchers provide an integrated approach towards enhancing the role of family and relatives. Although palliative care influenced the decision-making about euthanasia, the family and relatives played a vital role by persuading the patient’s autonomy.
Arras, John D. “Physician-assisted suicide: a tragic view.” J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol’y 13 (1996): 361. Web.
Brock, Dan W. “Voluntary active euthanasia.” The Hastings Center Report 22.2 (1992): 10-22. Web.
Callahan, Daniel. “When self-determination runs amok.” The Hastings Center Report 22.2 (1992): 52-55. Web.
Dierickx, Sigrid, et al. “Involvement of palliative care in euthanasia practice in a context of legalized euthanasia: a population-based mortality follow-back study.” Palliative medicine 32.1 (2018): 114-122. Web.
Kouwenhoven, Pauline SC, et al. “Developments in euthanasia practice in the Netherlands: Balancing professional responsibility and the patient’s autonomy.” European Journal of General Practice 25.1 (2018): 44-48. Web.
Leonard, Charles E., et al. “The quality of Medicaid and Medicare data obtained from CMS and its contractors: implications for pharmacoepidemiology.” BMC health services research 17.1 (2017): 1-7. Web.
McDowell, Liz, and Robbie Madden South. “Christians’ perceptions of receiving spiritual care in the bible belt of the United States: A qualitative study of care provided in the healthcare setting.” Religions 8.7 (2017): 127. Web.
Miller, David Gibbes, Rebecca Dresser, and Scott YH Kim. “Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications.” Journal of Medical Ethics 45.2 (2019): 84-89. Web.
Sfantou, Danae F., et al. “Importance of leadership style towards the quality of care measures in healthcare settings: a systematic review.” Healthcare. Vol. 5. No. 4. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2017. Web.
Pesapane, Filippo, et al. “Artificial Intelligence as a Medical Device in Radiology: Ethical and Regulatory Issues in Europe and the United States.” Insights into Imaging, vol. 9, no. 5, 2018, pp. 745–53. Crossref, Web.
Pesut, Barbara, et al. “Nursing and euthanasia: A narrative review of the nursing ethics literature.” Nursing Ethics 27.1 (2019): 152-167. Web.
Verhofstadt, Monica, Lieve Thienpont, and Gjalt-Jorn Ygram Peters. “When unbearable suffering incites psychiatric patients to request euthanasia: qualitative study.” The British Journal of Psychiatry 211.4 (2018): 238-245. Web.
Wilensky, Sara E., and Joel B. Teitelbaum. Essentials of health policy and law. Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2019.