Every business sector uses a defined and manageable supply chain framework where the link between firms or Corporations converts a string of essential services, goods, and solutions into ultimate products. In principle, builders, material suppliers, support teams, and project actors socialize within a beneficial process designed to buy a specific construct asset (Addis, 2016; Ahankoob et al., 2018). Supply chain management gives structure to the design of this arrangement (Ahuja et al., 2016; Al-Werikat, 2017). The construction sector is controlled by task-based events or activities and manufacturing organizations are assembled from independent participants linking in continuous coalitions of companies.
Task-based actions affect business structure and techniques, which result in a fragmented and transnational industry. As a result, the impact of sophistication or fabrication in the construction sector is high, and competence levels are low. Therefore, effective implementation of the proposed approaches could lower expenses, improve gross profits, support the goal to eliminate waste in the procedure, enhance competitive benefits, improve delivery time, productivity growth, and value production (Balasubramanian and Shukla, 2017; Bengtsson, 2018). The approach supports effective supplier retention, facilitates long-term organization and communication among contractors (Boateng, 2019). The advantages for end-users and construction clients include a more reactive business to meet specific requirements, reducing project delays, and reducing the cost of suppliers with minimal deficiencies.
The qualities or properties of the sector have been criticized and questioned whether such structure is, in fact, a business or fragmented joined arrangement of projects. In such interpretations, the essence of construction and the project focus on the sector has been recognized as a simple cause of constraints and issues of the industry (Denicol, Davies, and Krystallis, 2020). Some identified particular peculiarities of construction issues include temporary association, one-off structure, and task creation (Grubbauer, 2015; Havenvid et al., 2016). Based on these assumptions, construction tasks can be interpreted as a coalition of companies or a variety of independent entities collaborating to complete a task and functions as though it has been just one company (Hullova, Trott and Simms, 2016). However, there are important differences between various kinds of companies in terms of what they regard as essential to project success. The determinants of job success are not always simple and unambiguous, and it explains the fragmented and transnational nature of the industry. The expression ‘fragmentation’ could be defined based on the parties or firms involved with the constructions deliverables and consequences on the many procedures in the project.
Fragmentation describes divisions caused by the rising quantity of active agents and associations involved in all procedures of a construction task. Such interpretation has been enforced by the demand for specialization and diversity as construction jobs become complex. Fragmentation in the construction industry could be internal and external (Krystallis, Demian, and Price, 2015). Internal fragmentation denotes synchronization and incorporation between distinct alliance associations while external fragmentation denotes the participation of non-alliance businesses at distinct phases of the planned procedure.
Fragmented Construction Process
The principle in construction is multiform and non-uniform, created by the comparatively higher fragmentation of the sector in various sizes of companies, and required by the varying organizational arrangements of the task. The culture within a project-based event is often compared to a formal framework dominated by different sectors like manufacturing (Lindgren, 2016; Lindgren and Emmitt, 2017). The high standing of tasks clarifies the occurrence of two identities within the construction sector, which include the workplace (office setting) and a distinctive philosophy within each task activity. The disconnection between the workplace and project site affects corporate improvement plans within the project environment (Lindgren and Widén, 2018). Although site employees generate solutions daily, they are not considered or described as innovative. This clarifies why construction projects are not considered as innovative as other industrialized sectors. The fragmented construction system, controlling the influence of task culture, comparatively weak company philosophy, and absence of shared values, creates low client attention and opportunities to accomplish positive results (Loosemore, 2015; Mäki and Kerosuo, 2015). As a result, the project team leads have attempted to handle the uncertain nature of subcontractors, which magnifies the negative impact of task culture.
Shared relationships, improved supply chain integration, and collaboration must be aimed toward raising the identification of subcontractors, the contactor’s values, and culture to attain project success and client worth. The normative point across various projects is funding and delivery date. The project success is measured with its cost implications and finishing the project with the essential scheduling goal (Maylor et al., 2018). However, this is not very different in other project-established businesses. For example, in the film industry, the emphasis is on the proceeds when a film is launched, and rights are generating earnings. Due to the central role of events in construction, the project management work and the supervisor determine its performance and work schedules. The project manager provides the layout and implementation deliverables that match the client’s demands. The strategy could be more oriented towards conformance to contractual specifications rather than gaining extra financial advantages or competitive advantage in quality development. Construction has become oriented towards manufacturing and getting the job done on time and within budget. In the construction sector, the challenge is concentrated on task deliverables and the fragmented structure of the industry (Meng, 2017). As a result, it causes fundamental differences with other aspects of the project.
Supply Chain Management in Construction
One problem in the construction sector is that the supplier’s contract agreement is not effective or implemented in the long run. Therefore, contractual obligations decrease until providers become disoriented. The strategy to supply chain management is to deploy a plan that aligns with the task deliverables (Oludare, Okunola, and Oluseye, 2018). This begins during the design point, segmenting the job into bundles. Effective analysis and investigation based on comments from the distribution chain can create enormous cost advantages and value (Papadonikolaki, Vrijhoef, and Wamelink, 2016). Ability and manufacturing capacity in a marketplace controlled by demand and supply is especially important if employee bottlenecks must be averted.
Recently, businesses proposing continuity in construction have taken a growing interest in creating relationships with outsourcing suppliers. Task contracts and partnering agreements have initiated this strategy, encouraging the participation of dedicated suppliers while providing the allocation of work (Patil and Desai, 2018). This has resulted in better collaboration between direct designers and product suppliers to improve each task phase. Supply distribution integration requires an effective administration of managerial skills, innovation, and processes to organize the different components or elements of the project. The bullwhip effect shows the impact of retail disruptions on wholesale suppliers (Phong, 2018). Based on the assumption, construction clients must apply forecast practices, adopt a demand-based framework to foster communication and collaboration among team players.
Strategies to Improve Construction Supply Chain Management
Considering the impact of the supply chain on project performance, and the need to resolve the challenges of on-site schedules, the following propositions for enhancing SCM could be integrated between companies and contractors for positive outcomes within the supply chain. Therefore, construction clients could leverage the effective application of SCM to enhance project deliverables and influence the quality of work (Pryke, 2020). The proposal for effective management practices promotes another discussion concerning supply chain advancement in project completion. These practices have been concentrated on the tactical level, where there is a shortage of research. Secondly, the change from an operational to a strategic perspective places supply chain advancement as a corporate issue, which must be considered for strategic functions. Building supply distribution may have distinct actors and dominant parties.
Under a designer-dominated distribution framework, the contractor focuses on the connection between the customer and the programmer. As a result, the contractor authorizes the supplier to deliver materials and subcontract actions. In a contractor-dominated supply network, the team manages the connection between the customer and the builder since the burden of failure or success rest on the project supervisor. Each stage of the supply network attracts many stakeholders that contribute ideas or resources to achieve success. Stakeholders can function in different phases based on the contractual arrangement. Therefore, a data supply framework improves trade and communication between site workers, builders, suppliers, and contractors.
Thus, construction clients can access his proposal as a critical planning framework to enhance project delivery.
Provider’s and Subcontractor’s Growth
The ports between companies and project supervisors are constant through the full period of a job. In this way, the operation delivered by the builders influences the total functioning of the project. As a result, construction investment firms associated with fabricating must implement initiatives concerning the supplier’s development (Quélin, Kivleniece, and Lazzarini, 2017). Such endeavors include structured applications based on training, query session, and feedback or responses from such contractors, raw material providers, and suppliers. The client within the distribution chain invests funds to support these applications to get better outcomes in quality, dependability, and cost drives such innovative ideas. Following this period, the providers are rated, and a few are selected for further outsourcing projects based on their rating scale.
It is important for construction clients to assess the performance of delivery procedures as a continuous challenge to infuse, adjust and implement regular changes based on the distribution trend. Research regarding performance evaluation offers guidelines for supervisors in implementing performance measurement. Normally, the issues are concentrated on discovering the metrics and utilizing the info offered by these for advancement. Performance management phases represent the strategic perspectives of the supply chain process. As a continuous process, the construction client must apply the five steps of analysis. The phases include measure, store, analyze, report, and ‘use’. Under the ‘measure’ phase, the supervisor defines project perspectives, sets goals, weight values, measuring index, and practice. Under the store phase, the project supervisor must define a fact sheet, observe patterns, and store data. Under the ‘analyze’ phase, construction clients shall define rank ratings and structure. The report phase provides reference records for future representation. The usage of performance measurement methods proves to be critical to confront the supplier’s rivalry (Szentes and Eriksson, 2016). Using standardized metrics to rate the operation of providers and supply responses for these is an effective strategy to reduce the challenges of a fragmented and transactional industry. Such a strategy identifies the conventional perspective of the PDCA cycle.
Benchmarking is a developing concept in SMC. Benchmarking relies on effective solutions involving businesses to enhance project procedures and task schedules. Benchmarking can be deployed to evaluate the operation of metrics over a specific period. In this way, it is valuable for construction clients to promote benchmarking within the organization, contemplating the best methods for handling and identifying gaps between internal and external performance (Tee, Davies, and Whyte, 2019). Internal benchmarking tests team performance within the job site, while external benchmarking analyses distribution patterns among subcontractors and firms. The execution of a benchmarking program requires calculative attempts to match expectations and create confidence within the distribution chain.
In a typical distribution chain, suppliers develop comprehension about services, raw materials, and supply chain control. Though there are many providers in one distribution chain, it is uncommon to find a construction client that gathers knowledge from providers. Knowledge management describes the capacity to generate and determinate information concerning suppliers ratings, works schedules, and benchmarking (Thunberg, Rudberg, and Karrbom Gustavsson, 2017). The strategy permits team leaders to identify changes and adopt a KM framework for decision-making. The effective implementation of KM enhances information management in the distribution chain (Yu and Yang, 2018). The deployment of a digitized platform for information dissemination provides significant consequences for supply chain development, particularly in construction businesses.
Reducing Damage and Resource Waste
Waste management in construction is a novel approach in project schedules. The cost of waste management or waste identification is sometimes overrated. However, the waste identification initiative provides opportunities to evaluate task deliverables and remove non-value events. Adopting practices aiming at identifying non-value tasks or procedures will enhance supply chain management. An effective evaluation of these procedures can generate a redesign of workflows and contribute to optimizing project deliverables (van Fenema, Rietjens, and van Baalen, 2016). At the operations level, the construction client must recognize and remove redundant tasks. Using the doctrine within tiers of the distribution chain provides positive results because the interaction between the firms is continuous, and the supplier’s performance affects the quality of task delivery.
Using IT in SCM influences the overall performance of the project. Using an online data program in SCM will decrease interfacing challenges involving isolated parties within the distribution chain. Information technology enhances distribution functionality, supply efficiency, and enables team integration (Yu and Yang, 2018). Suppliers must collaborate to create appropriate IT application software and frequent analysis procedures of intricate data. The deployment of valued assets and architecture facilitates effective delivery and sustained productivity.
Effective HR Team
The human resource team organizes a specific talent pool for each work deliverables. The team documents performance assessment resolves disputes, allocates role specification and analysis. HRM provides industry training, talent pool, and determines efficient contractors for retention. As a result, construction clients must prepare a comprehensive training curriculum to equip suppliers with training to manage the distribution chain and minimize material waste.
Proposed Solutions to ease Construction Challenges
The supply chain describes the interrelated pyramid of distribution contracts essential to secure a constructed advantage. Assessing the supply chain entails comprehending the analysis and traceability of facilities and products, logistics, establishments, individuals, schedules, data, and tools that change raw materials for specific purposes (Verweij, van Meerkerk, and Korthagen, 2015). The principles of supply chain management (SCM) can be applied in four strategic roles in construction.
Supply Distribution on Site Actions
The focus could be on the consequences of the distribution chain’s on-site actions. The project aim tries to lower costs and period of site schedules. As a result, the principal aim is to guarantee trusted material and labor flows to prevent disturbance and shortage of work implements. This strategy can be accomplished by expanding the links between the site workers and input suppliers. Thus, the impact of collaboration between both parties must be effective to mitigate friction in communication and productivity.
Effective Distribution Chain
The focus could be on the effective logistics and distribution chain framework, with the goal of lowering delivery costs, lead-time, and task inventory. Based on the objectives of this strategy, raw material suppliers and bulk element providers must adopt SCM plans for an efficient and effective distribution chain.
Efficient Task Schedules and Coordination
The focus could be on shifting tasks from the project site to specific phases of the distribution chain. This justification could prevent inferior resource input on the project site or attain wider concurrency between task schedules and actions, which is not workable based on many technical dependencies. The objective is to decrease the overall expenses and delivery time (Zhai and Huang, 2017). It would also reduce the impact of interminable distance delivery and reduce the cost of damaged supplies. Construction is a dynamic process with complicating connections between participants and key actors. As a result, complications arise from poor management and coordination among team actors other site agents. SCM provides a few principles to tackle this fragmentation and improve effective collaboration between workers and employers. Though SCM within the construction sector has been researched, the utilization of SCM principles reveals that resource waste and other challenges are consistent and present.
Advancing Innovative Concepts for Integrated Management
The focus could be on the combined management and advancement of the distribution chain. Therefore, a size parameter must be subsumed to supply chain management. The project supervisor shall provide an innovative framework to enhance performance and permit integrated management of schedules, task deliverables, and supplies. All teams shall adopt real-time approaches, dispute resolution, and decision-making (Zhai et al., 2017). The number and value of inventory should be digitized to improve the decision-making process and project performance. The functions described above are not exclusive but should be applied as collaborative efforts to enhance project schedules. The focus is on the distribution chain of the project supervisors and the use of SCM to solve fragmented and transactional challenges in the construction industry.
This paper analyzed the challenges of project completion. The paper proposed strategies to ease the challenges of the fragmented industry. In summary, the construction client must organize the interface between site actions and the distribution chain. Consequently, the team supervisor must adopt strategies to support the distribution chain, such as task rescheduling and resource transfers. Such deployment will integrate site schedules with the supply framework. Most site delays come from poor distribution chains or damages. Therefore, the site contractor must provide an enabling environment for collaboration among employees, suppliers, partners, and service providers. Project supervisors must test delivery procedures as a continuous challenge to infuse, adjust and implement regular changes based on the distribution trend. Performance management phases represent the strategic perspectives of the supply chain process. Benchmarking relies on effective solutions involving businesses to enhance project procedures and task schedules. Adopting these procedures can generate a redesign of workflows and contribute to optimizing project deliverables.
Addis, M. (2016) ‘Tacit and explicit knowledge in construction management’, Construction Management and Economics, 34(1), pp. 439-445. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2016.1180416
Ahankoob, A. et al. (2018) ‘The impact of building information modelling (BIM) maturity and experience on contractor absorptive capacity’, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14, (5), pp. 363-380. Web.
Ahuja, R. et al. (2016) ‘Adoption of BIM by architectural firms in India: technology, organization, environment, perspective’, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(4), pp. 311-330. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2016.1186589
Al-Werikat, G. (2017) ‘Supply chain management in construction: revealed’, International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 6(3), pp. 106-110.
Balasubramanian, S. and Shukla, V. (2017) ‘Green supply chain management: an empirical investigation on the construction sector’, Supply Chain Management, 22(1), pp. 58-81. Web.
Bengtsson, S. (2018) ‘Coordinated construction logistics: an innovation perspective’, Journal of Construction Management and Economics, 37(5). pp. 294-307. Web.
Boateng, A. (2019) ‘Supply chain management and lean concept in construction: a case of Ghanaian building construction industry’, Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, 11(1), pp. 2034-2043. Web.
Denicol, J., Davies, A. and Krystallis, I. (2020) ‘What are the causes and cures of poor megaproject performance? A systematic literature review and research agenda’, Project Management Journal, 00(0), pp. 1-18. doi: 10.1177/8756972819896113
Grubbauer, M. (2015) ‘Circulating knowledge, marketization, and norm-making: international developers and construction firms in Eastern Europe since 2000’, Global Networks, 15(3), 288–306.
Havenvid, M. et al. (2016) ‘Renewal in construction projects: tracing effects of client requirements’, Construction Management and Economics, 34(11), pp. 790-807. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2016.1208364
Hullova, D., Trott, P. and Simms, C. (2016) ‘Uncovering the reciprocal complementarity between product and process innovation’, Research Policy, 45 (5), pp. 929-940. Web.
Krystallis, I., Demian, P. and Price, A. (2015) ‘Using BIM to integrate and achieve holistic future-proofing objectives in healthcare projects’, Construction Management and Economics, 33(11–12), 890-906. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2016.1164326
Lindgren, J. (2016) ‘Diffusing systemic innovations: influencing factors, approaches and further research’, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(1), pp. 19-28. Web.
Lindgren, J. and Emmitt, S. (2017) ‘Diffusion of a systemic innovation: a longitudinal case study of a Swedish multi-storey timber house building system’, Construction Innovation, 17(1), pp. 25-44. doi: 10.1108/CI-11-2015-0061
Lindgren, J. and Widén, K. (2018) ‘Diffusing building information management: knowledge integration, mechanisms and knowledge development’, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(5), pp. 347-362. Web.
Loosemore, M. (2015) ‘Building a new third construction sector through social enterprise’, Construction Management and Economics, 33(9), pp. 724-739. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2015.1090006
Mäki, T. and Kerosuo, H. (2015) ‘Site managers’ daily work and the uses of building information modelling in construction site management’, Construction Management and Economics, 33(3), 163–175. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2015.1028953
Maylor, H. et al. (2018) ‘Old theories, new contexts: extending operations management theories to projects’, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(6), pp. 1274-1288. Web.
Meng, X. (2017) ‘Lean management in the context of construction supply chains’, International Journal of Production Research, 57(11), pp. 3784-3798. Web.
Oludare, O., Okunola, S. and Oluseye, O. (2018) ‘Construction supply chain management systems in Lagos State, Nigeria’, Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2018, 5(6), pp. 299-309.
Papadonikolaki, E., Vrijhoef, R. and Wamelink, H. (2016) ‘The interdependences of BIM and supply chain partnering: empirical explorations’, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(6), pp. 476-494. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2016.1212693
Patil, D. and Desai, D. (2018) ‘Analysis of supply chain management in infrastructure and construction project planning for Maharashtra region’, International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 7(3), pp. 346-349.
Phong, N. (2018) ‘Application of supply chain management in construction industry’, Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 12(2), pp.11-19. Web.
Pryke, S. (2020) Successful construction supply chain management: concepts and case studies. 2nd edn. Sweden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Quélin, B., Kivleniece, I. and Lazzarini, S. (2017) ‘Public-private collaboration, hybridity and social value: towards new theoretical perspectives’, Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), pp. 763-792. doi: 10.1111/joms.12274
Szentes, H. and Eriksson, P. (2016) ‘Paradoxical organizational tensions between control and flexibility when managing large infrastructure projects’, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(4), pp. 1-9. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001081
Tee, R., Davies, A. and Whyte, J. (2019) ‘Modular designs and integrating practices: managing collaboration through coordination and cooperation’, Research Policy, 48(1), 51-61. Web.
Thunberg, M., Rudberg, M. and Karrbom Gustavsson, T. (2017) ‘Categorizing on-site problems: a supply chain management perspective on construction projects’, Construction Innovation, 17(1), pp. 90-111. Web.
van Fenema, P., Rietjens, S. and van Baalen, P. (2016) ‘Stability & reconstruction operations as mega projects: drivers of temporary network effectiveness’, International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), 839-861. Web.
Verweij, S., van Meerkerk, I. and Korthagen, I. (2015) ‘Reasons for contract changes in implementing Dutch transportation infrastructure projects: an empirical exploration’, Transport Policy, 37(1), pp. 195-202. Web.
Yu, D. and Yang, J. (2018) ‘Knowledge management research in the construction industry: a review. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(1), pp. 782-803. Web.
Zhai, Y. and Huang, G. (2017) ‘Operational hedging and coordination in prefabrication construction industry’, Procedia Manufacturing, 11(1), pp. 1178-1183. Web.
Zhai, Y. et al. (2017) ‘Production lead-time hedging and coordination in prefabricated construction supply chain management’, International Journal of Production Research, 55(14), 3984-4002. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1231432